- Docente: Giulia Bencini
- Credits: 6
- SSD: L-LIN/12
- Language: English
- Teaching Mode: Traditional lectures
- Campus: Forli
-
Corso:
Second cycle degree programme (LM) in
Intepreting (cod. 6057)
Also valid for Second cycle degree programme (LM) in Intepreting (cod. 6057)
-
from Oct 02, 2024 to Dec 11, 2024
Learning outcomes
Students know the main aspects (terminology, concepts and methods) of applied linguistics and are able to apply them to their comprehension and production of oral and written texts.
Course contents
This course explores the intersection of applied linguistics, interpreting and technology. We will examine the basic linguistic and cognitive processes involved in language use, focusing on spoken language production and comprehension, the psycholinguistics of dialogue, bilingualism, interpreting and processing multimodal input.
Readings/Bibliography
Book for the course (required)
Paul Warren (2013) Introducing Psycholinguistics, Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0-521-13056-1
Additional Readings
Altmann, G. T., & Mirković, J. (2009). Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 583-609.
Amos, R. M., & Pickering, M. J. (2020). A theory of prediction in simultaneous interpreting. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(4), 706–715. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S1366728919000671
Amos, R. M., Seeber, K. G., & Pickering, M. J. (2022). Prediction during simultaneous interpreting: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm. Cognition, 220, 104987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104987
Barr, D. J. (2008b). Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground. Cognition, 109(1), 18–40. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.005
Bock, K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Language Production: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 945-984). San Diego: Academic Press.
Bradlow, A. R., & Alexander, J. A. (2007). Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(4), 2339-2349.
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234.
Chung-Fat-Yim A, Hayakawa S, Marian V. Multilingualism and Cognitive Control in the Brain. In: Cabrelli J, Chaouch-Orozco A, González Alonso J, Pereira Soares SM, Puig-Mayenco E, Rothman J, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Third Language Acquisition. Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics. Cambridge University Press; 2023:519-554.
Dell, G. S., & Chang, F. (2014). The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1634), 20120394.
Dong Y, Li P. Attentional control in interpreting: A model of language control and processing control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 2019:1–13.
Hartsuiker, R., & Pickering, M. (2007). Language integration in bilingual sentence production. Acta Psychologica, 128(3), 479–489.
Hartsuiker, R., Pickering, M., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages: Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychologica Science, 1, 5, 409–414.
Huettig, F. (2015). Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research, 1626, 118-135. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014
Ito, A., Corley, M., & Pickering, M. J. (2017). A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, doi:10.1017/S1366728917000050
Mattys, S. L., Davis, M. H., Bradlow, A. R., & Scott, S. K. (2012). Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(7-8), 953-978.
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018). Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(10), 1002–1044. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/bul0000158
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169-226.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2007; 11(3):105–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329-392.
Romero-Rivas, C., Martin, C. D., & Costa, A. (2016). Foreign-accented speech modulates linguistic anticipatory processes. Neuropsychologia, 85, 245-255.
Segaert, K., Menenti, L., Weber, K., Petersson, K. M., & Hagoort, P. (2011). Shared syntax in language production and language comprehension—an fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 22(7), 1662-1670.
Seeber, K. G. (2017). Multimodal processing in simultaneous interpreting. In J. W. Schwieter, & A. Ferreira (Eds.), The handbook of translation and cognition (pp. 461–475). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241485.ch25
Teaching methods
Frontal lectures, in class activities, discussion, collaborative learning groups
Practical activities will focus mainly on summarizing, reformulating, describing data presented in graphs and charts.
Assessment methods
Attenders:
In class written exam with four short essay questions (300-450 words) on the contents of the course. Students may consult all of their resources (book, papers, ppts and class notes).
Oral presentation: a collaborative 30 min presentation of one or two articles from the course readings.
Non attenders:
Oral exam on the course contents (book, readings). Students may consult resources during the oral exam.
Teaching tools
Powerpoint slides and additional learning material
Office hours
See the website of Giulia Bencini