- Docente: Francesco Niccolò Moro
- Credits: 6
- SSD: SPS/04
- Language: English
- Teaching Mode: Traditional lectures
- Campus: Bologna
-
Corso:
Second cycle degree programme (LM) in
Legal Studies (cod. 9062)
Also valid for Second cycle degree programme (LM) in International Relations (cod. 9084)
-
from Sep 16, 2024 to Dec 10, 2024
Learning outcomes
At the end of the course unit, students: - know the fundamental aspects of the method, concepts, categories and key models of political science; - can describe and interpret political phenomena, especially the functioning and the evolutions of political-institutional systems, be they democratic or not; - can use analytical tools to decode the political debate in democratic countries and connect it with the most important topics dealt with by political science, on the one hand, and the linguistic and logical tools, on the other, in order to communicated the findings of a theoretical and empirical analysis to a public made up of specialists and non-specialists.
Course contents
The course examines different types of collective violence, including violence occurring in civil wars, instances of state repression, mafia and gang violence. It aims to explore the different “types” of violence, defining their main features and uncovering their rationale through a plurality of approaches. Ultimately, the class provides the theoretical and empirical tools to study violence in its relations with political order(s). The course is divided in two sections. The first section – conducted through frontal lectures – explores classic types of “political violence” (such as civil wars, revolutions and terrorism) looking at their origins and dynamics, then looks second section deals with violence perpetrated by states (such as repressions and genocides) and violence that occurs within states that does not challenge their existence or regime (such as that perpetrated by organized crime and gangs). The second section – run as a seminar in which students present and discuss the assigned material – looks at the organizations that “produce” violence, and namely at insurgent and mafia groups, analyzing their emergence, their internal functioning, and their relations with violence.
NOTE: The course is open exclusively to exchange students (Erasmus, Turing, Overseas, …) enrolled in Master’s level degrees.
Readings/Bibliography
Week 1
1. Introduction to the course: The Politics of Collective Violence (Lecture)
§ Gat, A. (2009). So why do people fight? Evolutionary theory and the causes of war. European Journal of International Relations, 15(4), 571-599
§ Tilly, C. (2003). The politics of collective violence. Cambridge University Press, ch.1
§ Thucydides, “Civil war in Corcyra”, The Peloponnesian War, Book III, 69-85.
2. Violence, War(s) and Political Order(s) (Lecture)
§ Gat, A. (2011) “The Changing Character of War”, in Strachan, H., & Scheipers, S. (Eds.). The changing character of war. OUP Oxford *
§ Kalyvas, S. N. (2019). The Landscape of Political Violence, in Chenoweth et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Terrorism
Week 2
3. Civil Wars (1): What, Where & Why (Lecture)
§ Allansson, Marie, Erik Melander and Lotta Themnér, 2017. Organized violence, 1989-2016. Journal of Peace Research. 54(4):574-587
§ Fearon, J. (2017), Civil War & the Current International System. Dædalus 146(4), 18-32
§ Data Source: http://ucdp.uu.se/
4. Civil Wars (2): What, Where & Why (Lecture)
§ Dixon, J. (2009). What causes civil wars? Integrating quantitative research findings. International Studies Review, 11(4), 707-735.
§ Stewart, F. (2011). Horizontal inequalities as a cause of conflict: A review of CRISE findings available on: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/9126/WDR2011_0029.pdf?sequence=1
Week 3
5. Logic(s) of Violence in Civil Wars (Lecture)
§ Cederman, L. E., & Vogt, M. (2017). Dynamics and logics of civil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(9), 1992-2016
- Kalyvas, S. N. (1999). Wanton and senseless? The logic of massacres in Algeria. Rationality and Society, 11(3), 243-285
- Kydd, A. H., & Walter, B. F. (2006). The strategies of terrorism. International Security, 31(1), 49-80
- Data Sources:
- https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/
6. Riots, Banditry & Revolutions (Lecture)
§ Scott, J.C. (1989). Everyday forms of resistance. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 4(1), 33
§ Blok, A. (1972). The peasant and the brigand: social banditry reconsidered. Comparative studies in Society and History, 14(4), 494-503
§ Goldstone, J. A. (2001). Toward a fourth generation of revolutionary theory. Annual review of political science, 4(1), 139-187
Week 4
7. State repression, Terror and Genocides (Lecture)
- Davenport, C. (2007). State repression and political order. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 1-23
- Pion-Berlin, D., & Lopez, G. A. (1991). Of victims and executioners: Argentine state terror, 1975–1979. International Studies Quarterly, 35(1), 63-86
§ Valentino, B. (2000). Final solutions: the causes of mass killing and genocide. Security Studies, 9(3), 1-59
8. Organized crime and violence (Lecture)
- Lessing, B. (2015). Logics of violence in criminal war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59(8), 1486-1516
- Trejo, G., & Ley, S. (2018). Why did drug cartels go to war in Mexico? Subnational party alternation, the breakdown of criminal protection, and the onset of large-scale violence. Comparative Political Studies, 51(7), 900-937
- Data source: https://www.icc-ccs.org/piracy-reporting-centre/live-piracy-map
- Mid-term Take-Home Exam distributed
***
Section 2 - Seminars: Organizing violence
Week 5
9. Seminar 1 - Start-up rebels (1): Organizational types
§ Staniland, P. (2014). Networks of rebellion: Explaining insurgent cohesion and collapse. Cornell University Press, chs. 1-2 *
§ Weinstein, J. M. (2006). Inside rebellion: The politics of insurgent violence. Cambridge University Press, chs. 1-2 *
10. Seminar 2 - Start-up rebels (2): Motives and myths
§ Costalli, S., & Ruggeri, A. (2017). Introduction. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(4), 923-927
§ Moro, F. N. (2017). Organizing Emotions and Ideology in Collective Armed Mobilization. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(4), 944-947
§ Nussio, E. (2017). How Ideology Channels Indeterminate Emotions into Armed Mobilization. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(4), 928-931
§ Petersen, R. (2017). Emotions as the Residue of Lived Experience. PS: Political Science & Politics 50(4), 932-935
§ Schubiger, L. I., & Zelina, M. (2017). Ideology in armed groups. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(4), 948-952
§ Peters, K., & Richards, P. (1998). ‘Why we fight’: Voices of youth combatants in Sierra Leone. Africa, 68(2), 183-210
Week 6
11. Seminar 3 - Rebel violence
§ Weinstein, J. M. (2006). Inside rebellion: The politics of insurgent violence. Cambridge University Press, chs. 5-6 *
§ Hoover Green, A. H. (2016). The commander’s dilemma: Creating and controlling armed group violence. Journal of Peace Research, 53(5), 619-632
12. Seminar 4 - Rebel governance
§ Arjona, A. (2014). Wartime institutions: a research agenda. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(8), 1360-1389
§ Terpstra, N., & Frerks, G. (2017). Rebel governance and legitimacy: Understanding the impact of rebel legitimation on civilian compliance with the LTTE Rule. Civil Wars, 19(3), 279-307
§ Mampilly, Z. (2012). Rebel rulers: Insurgent governance and civilian life during war. Cornell University Press, chs. 2 and 3*.
Week 7
13. Seminar 5 - Comparisons (1): Organizing Crime
§ Catino, M. (2019). Mafia organizations, chs. 1-3
§ Morselli, C., Giguère, C., & Petit, K. (2007). The efficiency/security trade-off in criminal networks. Social networks, 29(1), 143-153
§ Leeson, P. T., & Rogers, D. B. (2012). Organizing crime. Supreme Court Economic Review, 20(1), 89-123
14. Seminar 6 - Comparisons (2): Mafia violence
§ Catino, M. (2019). Mafia organizations, ch. 4
- Berg, L. A., & Carranza, M. (2018). Organized criminal violence and territorial control: Evidence from northern Honduras. Journal of Peace Research, 55(5), 566-581
§ Magaloni, B., Franco-Vivanco, E., & Melo, V. (2020). Killing in the Slums: Social Order, Criminal Governance, and Police Violence in Rio de Janeiro. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 552-572. doi:10.1017/S0003055419000856
§ Papachristos, A. V., Hureau, D. M., & Braga, A. A. (2013). The corner and the crew: the influence of geography and social networks on gang violence. American Sociological Review, 78(3), 417-447
Teaching methods
Lectures (classes 1-8) and seminars (classes 9-14)
Assessment methods
Assessment
1. Students who regularly attend classes will be assessed through:
§ a take-home midterm exam on section 1 of the program (50% of the grade)
§ class presentation and participation in section 2 (25 % of the grade)
§ an article review (1000 words) on an article to be agreed with the instructor (25% of the grade).
Students are required to read assigned material before classes. Starting from session #9, the course will be structured around student groups’ presentations of assigned class material corresponding to the topic of the session. Composition of groups and schedules of the presentations will be agreed at the beginning of the semester.
2. Students who DO NOT regularly attend classes will be assessed through a final take-home written exam. The exam will be composed by 3 questions and students will have to provide answers in the range of 1000 words each. Exams will be made available on Esami OnLine (EOL) 4 days before the exam dates (“appelli”) as posted on AlmaEsami and will be due on exam date by noon.
Final mark grading criteria:
- Preparation on a very limited number of topics covered in the course and ability to analyze emerging only with the help of the lecturer, expression in overall correct language → 18-19;
- Preparation on a limited number of topics covered in the course and ability to analyze autonomously only on purely executive issues, expression in correct language → 20-24;
- Preparation on a large number of topics dealt with in the course, ability to make autonomous choices of critical analysis, mastery of specific terminology → 25-29;
- Substantially comprehensive preparation on topics dealt with in the course, ability to make autonomous choices of critical analysis and linking, full mastery of specific terminology and ability to argue and self-reflect → 30-30 L
Teaching tools
Slides uploaded on Virtuale
Office hours
See the website of Francesco Niccolò Moro